A randomized phase II trial of doxorubicin plus pemetrexed followed by docetaxel versus doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel as neoadjuvant treatment of early breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) before surgery is a standard option for patients with early breast cancer (EBC) that allows in vivo chemosensitivity testing. Given the promising activity of pemetrexed plus doxorubicin in metastatic breast cancer, it was reasonable to evaluate the utility of this combination as part of an NST regimen in EBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with untreated operable T2-T4a-c N0-2 M0 breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive either four cycles of pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) plus doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks (q3w) followed by four cycles of docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) q3w (AP-D) or four cycles of doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) q3w followed by four cycles of docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) q3w (AC-D). Surgery was carried out within 2 months after last chemotherapy. Primary end point was pathological complete response (pCR) rate in the breast. Secondary end points included clinical response rate, rate of histologically negative axillary lymph nodes, toxicity, and disease-free survival. RESULTS: From September 2005 to August 2007, 257 patients were randomly allocated to 17 sites. Median age was 48 and 49 years for AP-D and AC-D, respectively. Overall pCR rates were 16.5% for AP-D and 20.2% for AC-D. With AP-D, pCR rate was 17.8% for hormone receptor (HR)-negative patients and 15.9% for HR-positive patients. With AC-D, pCR rates were 42.9% and 7.8% for HR-negative and HR-positive patients, respectively. Clinical response rates were 59.5% in the AP-D group and 68.1% in the AC-D group. The rate of histologically negative axillary lymph nodes was 53% in both groups. Both treatments were well tolerated. Median disease-free survival is currently not mature. CONCLUSIONS: AP-D and AC-D are well tolerated and active as NST in EBC. Of note, AC-D had a higher pCR rate in HR-negative tumors, whereas AP-D had more activity if HRs were expressed.

Gemcitabine combined with cisplatin as first-line treatment in patients 60 years or older with epithelial ovarian cancer: a phase II study.

This phase II study evaluated the activity and toxicity of gemcitabine plus cisplatin as first-line treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Chemonaive patients >/=60-year-old with FIGO stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma were enrolled. Patients received cisplatin 75 mg /m2 on day 1 and gemcitabine 1250 mg /m2 on day 1 (before cisplatin) and day 8 of a 21-day cycle. Of 44 female patients (median age, 70 years), 72.7% had stage IIIC disease and 67.4% had a Karnofsky performance status >/=80. Of the 37 response-evaluable patients (35 with measurable lesion[s] >/=2 cm), there were seven (18.9%) pathologic complete responses, two (5.4%) pathologic partial responses, two (5.4%) clinical complete responses, and 12 (32.4%) clinical partial responses, for an overall response rate of 62.2% (95% CI, 44.8%-77.5%), and a pathologic response rate of 24.3% (95% CI, 11.8%-41.2%). Median survival was 27.7 months (95% CI, 14.3-40.8 months). Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 59.5% and 30.2% of patients, respectively, with neutropenic fever in one patient. Grade 3 nausea /vomiting and alopecia occurred in 25.6% and 9.5% of patients, respectively. We conclude that gemcitabine plus cisplatin is active and feasible as first-line treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in patients >/=60 years. Further clinical trials adding gemcitabine to current standard, first-line treatment seem warranted in younger as well as older patients.

Survey of genital lichen sclerosus in women and men.

We present the clinical and laboratory findings in 60 women and 42 men with lichen sclerosus.

Chemotherapy versus hormonal treatment in platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer: a randomised trial of the German Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie (AGO) Study Group Ovarian Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The majority of patients with ovarian cancer are not cured by first-line treatment. Until now, no study could demonstrate any substantial benefit when exposing ovarian cancer patients to second-line chemotherapy. However, most treatment regimens induce toxicity, thus negatively influencing the quality of rather limited life spans. Here we evaluate whether a second-line chemotherapy can offer any benefit compared with a less toxic hormonal treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with ovarian cancer progressing during platinum-paclitaxel containing first-line therapy or experiencing relapse within 6 months were eligible. Patients were stratified for response to primary treatment (progression versus no change/response), and measurable versus non-measurable disease. Treatment consisted of either treosulfan 7 g/m5 infused over 30 min or leuprorelin 3.75 mg injected subcutaneously or intramuscularly. Both regimens were repeated every 4 weeks. RESULTS: This study began in late 1996, and after 2.5 years accrual an interim analysis was performed when several investigators reported their concern about a suspected lack of efficacy. Following this analysis the recruitment was stopped early and the 78 patients already enrolled were followed up. The majority of patients received treatment until progressive disease was diagnosed or death occurred. Treatment delay was observed rarely and dose reduction was performed only in the treosulfan arm in 5% of 150 courses. Overall, both treatment arms were well tolerated. No objective responses were observed. The median survival time was 36 and 30 weeks in the treosulfan and leuprorelin arms, respectively. Overall survival did not differ between patients with relapse 3-6 months after first-line chemotherapy compared with patients with progressive disease within 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: The selected patient population represents a subgroup with extremely poor prognosis. Accordingly, results were not impressive. Both treatment arms showed favourable toxicity data, but failed to show remarkable activity, thus adding only limited evidence to the issue of whether patients with refractory ovarian cancer might benefit from second-line chemotherapy. Even stratified analysis did not identify any subgroup of patients in whom the administration of second-line chemotherapy could demonstrate a clinically relevant survival benefit.

Immunological consolidation of ovarian carcinoma recurrences with monoclonal anti-idiotype antibody ACA125: immune responses and survival in palliative treatment. See The biology behind: K. A. Foon and M. Bhattacharya-Chatterjee, Are solid tumor anti-idiotype vaccines ready for prime time? Clin. Cancer Res., 7:1112-1115, 2001.

The aim of the present study was to assess whether the induction of specific immune responses by vaccination with the murine monoclonal anti-idiotypic antibody ACA125, which imitates the tumor-associated antigen CA125, has a positive influence on the survival of patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma. Forty-two patients with platinum-pretreated recurrences were included in a clinical Phase I/II trial of consolidation in third-line therapy. Patients initially received four immunizations with 2 mg of alum-precipitated anti-idiotype ACA125 every 2 weeks and then monthly applications. No serious allergic reactions could be detected within a maximal control period of 56 months. Hyperimmune sera of 27 of 42 patients (64.2%) showed increased concentrations of human antimouse antibodies. Specific anti-anti-idiotypic antibodies as a marker for induced immunity were detected in 28 of 42 patients (66.7%). The survival of the whole ACA125-treated collective of patients after a mean of 12.6 antibody applications was 14.9 +/- 12.9 months. The survival of patients with a positive immune response was 19.9 +/- 13.1 months in contrast with 5.3 +/- 4.3 months in those patients without detectable anti-CA125 immunity (P < 0.0001). According to these results, vaccination with a suitable anti-idiotypic antibody offers an effective way to induce specific immunity against a primarily nonimmunogenic tumor antigen such as CA125 and is associated with a positive impact on the survival of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer with few side effects, which warrants a Phase III trial for ovarian cancer patients after primary therapy.

Expression and potential role of Fas-associated phosphatase-1 in ovarian cancer.

Fas-associated phosphatase-1 (FAP-1) is a protein-tyrosine phosphatase that binds the cytosolic tail of Fas (Apo1, CD95), presumably regulating Fas-induced apoptosis. Elevations of FAP-1 protein levels in some tumor cell lines have been correlated with resistance to Fas-induced apoptosis. To explore the expression of FAP-1 in ovarian cancer cell lines and archival tumor specimens, mouse monoclonal and rabbit polyclonal antibodies were generated against a FAP-1 peptide and recombinant FAP-1 protein. These antibodies were used for immunoblotting, immunohistochemistry, and flow-cytometry analysis of FAP-1 expression in the Fas-sensitive ovarian cancer lines HEY and BG-1, and in the Fas-resistant lines OVCAR-3 FR and SK-OV-3. All methods demonstrated high levels of FAP-1 in the resistant lines OVCAR-3 FR and SK-OV-3, but not in the Fas-sensitive lines HEY and BG-1. Furthermore, levels of FAP-1 protein also correlated with the amounts of FAP-1 mRNA, as determined by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction analysis. FAP-1 protein levels were investigated by immunoblotting in the National Cancer Institute's panel of 60 human tumor cell lines. Although FAP-1 failed to correlate with Fas-resistance across the entire tumor panel, Fas-resistance correlated significantly with FAP-1 expression (P: < or = 0.05) and a low Fas/FAP-1 ratio (P: < or = 0.028) in ovarian cancer cell lines. FAP-1 expression was also evaluated in 95 archival ovarian cancer specimens using tissue-microarray technology. FAP-1 was expressed in nearly all tumors, regardless of histological type or grade, stage, patient age, response to chemotherapy, or patient survival. We conclude that FAP-1 correlates significantly with Fas resistance in ovarian cancer cell lines and is commonly expressed in ovarian cancers.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) receptor gene expression of ovarian carcinoma does not correlate with G-CSF caused cell proliferation.

BACKGROUND: Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) is a growth factor commonly used to avoid leukopenia after chemotherapy. Endogenous G-CSF is produced by macrophages and granulocytes that infiltrate tumors. It has been reported that rhG-CSF stimulates the proliferation of several cell lines as well as bladder carcinoma cells. Conversely, in some hematopoietic cell lines such as U-937, WEHI-3B, and K-562 no effect or in some cases a differentiation pattern was found. Moreover, the role of rhG-CSF on the proliferation of solid tumors is not well understood. METHODS: In this study, 10 ovarian carcinoma biopsies were characterized for the presence of G-CSF and G-CSF receptor by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and immunohistochemical analysis. Proliferation was analyzed by ATP viability assays. RESULTS: Performing RT-PCR, these biopsies and four ovarian carcinoma cell lines were analyzed for endogenous G-CSF production, which was found in some biopsies and in all cell lines. Despite the presence of the G-CSF receptor in all biopsies and cell lines, no proliferation was found after rhG-CSF incubation of the cell lines or the tumor samples for 3 and for 6 days, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Summarizing the authors' in vitro studies, rhG-CSF does not affect the proliferation of ovarian carcinoma cells in vitro.

Evaluation of methods to detect p53 mutations in ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The p53 status is increasingly regarded as a marker predictive of response to particular cancer therapies, but for this approach it is self-evident that the p53 status must be determined correctly. METHODS: We have tested ovarian cancers with single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis (SSCP), immunohistochemical staining with DO-1 anti-p53 antibody (IHC), and yeast p53 functional assay (FASAY). RESULTS: These techniques commonly used to detect p53 mutations showed important differences in their sensitivity. Of 53 tumors tested with three indirect techniques, 27 (50%), 33 (62%) and 41 (77%) were positive by SSCP, IHC, and FASAY, respectively. In a subset of 32 tumors strongly suspected of containing mutations, 25 (78%), 26 (81%), 29 (91%) and 30 (94%) were positive by SSCP, immunostaining, DNA sequencing and yeast assay, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Under comparable routine conditions, the FASAY reached the highest sensitivity. Since no single technique detected all mutations, we recommend the use of at least two different techniques in situations where the p53 status will affect patient management.

Cross-linked type I collagen C- and N-telopeptides in women with bone metastases from breast cancer.

This study documents values of biochemical markers of bone remodeling in 106 patients with breast cancer. Based on scintigraphic and radiological findings, patients were divided into 3 groups: 19 patients with bone metastases, 65 patients without bone metastases and normal bone scintigrams, and 22 patients with pathological, non-malignant findings on scintigraphy without proof of bone metastases. Urinary cross-linked type I collagen N-telopeptides (NTx) and serum cross-linked type I collagen C-telopeptides (ICTP) were assessed as markers of bone resorption. Bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP) was assessed as a marker of bone formation. All three markers were significantly higher in patients with bone metastases compared to both patients without skeletal recurrence and those with pathological, non-malignant scintigraphic findings (p < 0.01). There were no statistically significant differences between the latter two groups. The clinical sensitivity for diagnosing bone metastases was 44% for NTx, 65% for ICTP, and 26% for BAP, respectively. The clinical specificitiy for discriminating patients with bone disease from those without were 79%, 91%, and 92% for NTx, ICTP, and BAP, respectively. In conclusion, markers of bone remodeling are increased in patients with breast cancer metastatic to the skeleton. The sensitivity of the markers presented in this paper did not seem to be sufficient enough for early identification of patients with subclinical bone recurrence in a clinical practice setting.

[Anthracyclines in therapy of ovarian carcinoma: a systematic review of primary and 2nd-line therapy after platinum]. / Anthrazykline in der Therapie des Ovarialkarzinoms: eine systematische Ubersicht zur Primär- und 2nd-line-Therapie nach Platin.

Despite being the subject of clinical research for more than 20 years, the role of anthracyclines in the treatment of ovarian cancer is still undefined. This review summarizes and re-evaluates the published data with the anthracylines doxorubicin, epirubicin (4'-epi-doxorubicin), daunorubicin (idarubicin), aclarubicin, and pirarubicin. The studies were identified by MEDLINE-search and analysis of the references cited in the identified articles and reviews covering this subject. First-line therapy: Studies from the 70ies could demonstrate that doxorubicin was as effective as alkylating agents. The combination of anthracylines and alkylating agents provided superior results compared with alkylating agents alone. Further improvements were gained by the introduction of platinum-anthracyline combination regimens. Doxorubicin and epirubicin showed comparable activity when combined with platinum. The comparison between platinum-anthracyline containing combination regimens with platinum based regimens without anthracylines did not provide definitive answers. The majority of studies (with relatively small patient numbers) did not reveal any significant benefit for the anthracyline containing regimens. In contrast, four meta-analyses combining several studies showed a significant improvement when anthracylines were added to platinum based regimens. This question came up again when standard treatment for ovarian cancer was modified by the introduction of paclitaxel in the mid 90ies. Currently, two randomized large intergroup trials evaluate the role of anthracyclines in combination with platinum and paclitaxel. Results from these studies will be available in 1-2 years and might help to describe the role for anthracyclines in ovarian cancer treatment more precisely. Until then, the use of anthracyclines in upfront chemotherapy of ovarian cancer outside of clinical trials cannot be recommended. 2n-line therapy: The anthracyclines doxorubicin and epirubicin are among the most active single agents for the treatment of platinum refractory ovarian cancer. Both agents achieved tumor responses in up to 25%. Preliminary data suggest, that the combination with paclitaxel could increase efficacy. No such effect was reported for any other combination. In contrast, single agent anthracyclines cannot be recommended for treatment of platinum sensitive tumors. However, combining anthracyclines with platinum resulted in remarkable response rates of more than 50% of patients with platinum sensitive tumors. Only few studies report the use of anthracylines after platinum and paclitaxel containing first-line chemotherapy. Preliminary data from small studies (40 patients) suggest that anthracyclines showed activity in this particular population. No final conclusions can be drawn. There is a need for developing effective 2nd-line therapies for patients failing platinum and paclitaxel combination regimens. Among others, anthracyclines should be evaluated in this clinical setting.

Detection of T helper responses, but not of human papillomavirus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses, after peptide vaccination of patients with cervical carcinoma.

Human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16)-encoded E7 oncoprotein is constitutively expressed in cervical carcinoma cells and is required for cellular transformation to be maintained. The E7 protein, therefore, forms an attractive target for T-cell-mediated immune intervention to prevent or treat HPV16+ tumors. The authors performed a peptide-based phase I/II vaccination trial to induce anti-tumor immune responses in patients with recurrent or residual cervical carcinoma. Fifteen HLA-A*0201+ patients with HPV16+ cervical carcinoma received vaccinations with synthetic peptides representing 2 HPV16 E7-encoded, HLA-A*0201-restricted cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitopes and a pan-HLA-DR-binding T-helper epitope, PADRE, in adjuvant. No signs of toxicity were observed. Two patients had stable disease for more than 1 year after vaccination, 3 patients died of the disease during or shortly after the vaccination period, and 10 patients maintained progressive cervical carcinoma. Specific immune responses directed against the vaccine components were analyzed in peripheral blood samples. No cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses against the HPV16 E7 peptides were detectable. After vaccination, strong PADRE helper peptide-specific proliferation was detected in 4 of 12 patients. In conclusion, peptide vaccination with 2 HPV16 E7 cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitopes and a universal T helper epitope is well tolerated by patients with advanced cervical carcinoma. Despite a reduction of in vitro cytolytic or proliferative recall responses to some, but not all, conventional antigens in this patient group, peptide-specific proliferative responses were induced in 4 patients. Based on the current study, it is now feasible to perform peptide vaccination in earlier stages of HPV16-induced cervical disease.

G-CSF receptor expression in ovarian cancer.

Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) is clinically used to overcome neutropenic periods during chemotherapy. In vitro studies using cell lines as a model system have recently suggested that G-CSF can promote ovarian cancer growth. The objective of this work is to determine whether tumor cells express G-CSF-receptors (G-CSFR). A set of ovarian tumor biopsies and ovarian cancer cell lines was analyzed by RT-PCR, immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence. The presence of a 276 bp-amplicon (exon 8-10) obtained by RT-PCR showed that 12 out of 16 ovarian tumor biopsies and two out of four ovarian cancer cell lines expressed G-CSFR-mRNA. G-CSFR-protein was detected in tumor cells of the 12 biopsies that also contained G-CSFR-mRNA. A second 409 bp-amplicon (exon 17) obtained by RT-PCR from the variable C-terminal cytoplasmic region of G-CSFR could be amplified only in four out of 16 biopsies and in none of the ovarian cancer cell lines studied. The results presented here indicate that G-CSFR is frequently expressed in ovarian cancer cells. Moreover, the failure of RT-PCR amplification of the 409 bp-amplicon in samples that express G-CSFR-mRNA suggests that C-terminal truncated receptor forms are also expressed.

Vaccination with HPV16 peptides of patients with advanced cervical carcinoma: clinical evaluation of a phase I-II trial.

A phase I-II clinical trial was performed involving vaccination with HPV16 E7 peptides of patients suffering from HPV16 positive cervical carcinoma which was refractory to conventional treatment. Patients receiving the vaccine were HLA-A*0201 positive with HPV16 positive cervical carcinoma. The clinical trial was designed as a dose-escalation study, in which successive groups of patients received 100 micrograms, 300 micrograms or 1000 micrograms of each peptide, respectively. The vaccine consisted of two HPV16 E7 peptides and one helper peptide emulsified in Montanide ISA 51 adjuvant. 19 patients were included in the study, no adverse side-effects were observed. 2 patients showed stable disease for 1 year after vaccination; 15 patients showed progressive disease of whom 1 died during the vaccination treatment due to progressive disease; and 2 patients showed tumour-regression after chemotherapy following vaccination. A relative low count of lymphocytes before and after vaccination was present in 11/19 patients indicating that these patients were immunocompromised. This study shows that HPV16 E7 peptide vaccination is feasible, even in a group of patients with terminal disease. This paves the way for vaccinating patients with less advanced disease, whose immune system is less compromised by progressive disease.

Evaluation of neurotoxicity induced by paclitaxel second-line chemotherapy.

The most important cytotoxic drugs for the treatment of ovarian cancer, platinum compounds and paclitaxel, are known to induce neurotoxicity, which is dose limiting when higher paclitaxel doses are used or platinum-pretreated patients are treated. The absolute dose of paclitaxel per course has been demonstrated to be an important risk factor for the development of neurotoxicity. The role of cumulative dose, treatment duration and infusion schedule as additional risk factors are still in debate, and are therefore evaluated in this study. This study evaluates paclitaxel induced neurotoxicity in 38 patients, most of whom had already received platinum treatment, receiving either 135 or 175 mg/m2 as 3-h or 24-h infusion. Patients were compared with an age-matched control group. A detailed questionnaire and neurophysiological measurements including vibration perception threshold were used. Overall, the majority of patients (76%) developed some degree of neurotoxicity, but symptoms were usually mild or moderate with no grade 3/4 neurotoxicity observed. Age has been demonstrated to be an important risk factor for the development of neurotoxicity. Furthermore, the higher dose per course showed a significant impact on neurotoxicity, while the different infusion schedules were of minor importance. Vibration threshold perception, 2-point discrimination, a walking-the-line test, and reports of paresthesias were shown to be the most sensitive and useful parameters for neurotoxicity evaluation. Neurotoxicity is a common adverse event during paclitaxel chemotherapy in platinum-pretreated patients. A clinically useful test panel composed of a detailed history and the above three easily performed neurophysiological evaluations should be incorporated into future studies evaluating new drugs, treatment modifications, new combinations, and potential modulators of chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity.

Phase II study of gemcitabine in ovarian cancer.

This phase II study evaluated the response rate and toxicity of single-agent gemcitabine in 40 women with epithelial ovarian cancer, previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients had stage III or IV disease and progressive disease 1-12 months after the last treatment. Gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 was administered on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 28-day cycle as a 30-minute infusion. The overall response rate to gemcitabine was 22% (95% confidence intervals: 10-39%). Responses to gemcitabine were observed in patients with platinum-refractory disease, which suggests no cross resistance to platinum. Gemcitabine was well tolerated and no grade 4 toxicity was seen. This study confirms that gemcitabine is active and well tolerated in pre-treated women with ovarian cancer.

First-line chemotherapy with epirubicin, paclitaxel, and carboplatin for advanced ovarian cancer: a phase I/II study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Ovarian Cancer Study Group.

PURPOSE: Despite the progress that has been achieved over the years, survival rates in patients with advanced ovarian cancer are still disappointing. New methods to improve the efficiency of first-line chemotherapy are warranted. One method to improve results is to add more non-cross-resistant drugs to platinum-paclitaxel combination regimens. Anthracyclines are among the candidates for incorporation as the "third drug" into first-line regimens for advanced ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a phase I/II trial with escalating doses of epirubicin (60, 75, and 90 mg/m2) combined with fixed doses of paclitaxel and carboplatin in 27 previously untreated patients with advanced gynecologic malignancies. RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicity occurred at dose level 2 (75 mg/m2 epirubicin) and consisted of myelosuppression (neutropenia, thrombocytopenia). No dose-limiting, nonhematologic toxicities were observed. The maximum tolerable dose was epirubicin 60 mg/m2 (E) combined with a 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (T) and carboplatin AUC 5 (Carbo). Preliminary analysis indicated promising activity against ovarian cancer. CONCLUSION: The three-drug combination ET-Carbo, given according to the outlined dose and schedule, should be considered for further phase III evaluation. A randomized German-French intergroup trial comparing ET-Carbo with carboplatin-paclitaxel has already been initiated.

Response to IL-6 of HPV-18 cervical carcinoma cell lines.

The human papillomavirus type 18 (HPV-18) upstream regulatory region (URR) controls cell type-specific expression of the viral oncoproteins E6 and E7. The HPV-18 URR is active in the cervical carcinoma cell line HeLa but inactive in the hepatoma cell line HepG2. C/EBPss (NF-IL-6) was shown to participate as an important regulator in HPV transcription dependent on the cell type. The finding that C/EPBss is critical for HPV-18 URR activity and that C/EPBss is induced by IL-6 offers the opportunity of manipulating HPV activity by specific cytokine treatment. In this report, we show that treatment with IL-6 results in activation of HPV-18 URR activity in HepG2 cells. In contrast, the HPV-18 URR is not inducible by IL-6 in three cervical carcinoma cell lines. In all three cell lines we found decreased expression of the IL-6 receptor compared to the IL-6-responsive HepG2 cells, whereas the level of expression of the signal transduction component gp130 is present in all cells. These results suggest that cervical carcinoma cells may circumvent the IL-6-induced cellular defense mechanism through downregulation of the IL-6-receptor.

Clinical phase I study with one-hour paclitaxel infusion.

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel (PAC) is one of the major anti-cancer drugs, effective in different tumors. Studies with 24-hour infusion with 135 mg/m2 and a three-hour infusion with 175 mg/m2 showed a significant schedule-dependent toxicity. We evaluated a one-hour infusion schedule within a phase I study to determine the dose limiting toxicity (DLT), the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and the anti-cancer efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced malignant tumors were treated within cohorts by one-hour infusional paclitaxel starting with 150 mg/m2 and stepwise escalation with 25 mg/m2 increments. Therapy was repeated in three-week intervals. Cycles were repeated until progression. Toxicity was closely monitored, anti-cancer efficacy was only evaluated in those patients who received at minimum two treatment cycles. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients entered the study (11 NSCLC, five SCLC, seven ovarian cancer, one cervix cancer, nine MBC, one HN cancer). The MTD was PAC 250 mg/m2. The DLT was central and peripheral neuropathy (WHO grade 3). Other significant toxicities were fatigue, myalgia/arthralgia and paraesthesia. No significant myelotoxicity was observed. Totally twentyone patients were evaluable for response. A partial response was observed in five (24%) patients (two NSCLC, two ovarian cancer, one head and neck cancer). Three (14%) patients had stable disease and in 13 (62%) patients progressive disease was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 on day 1 administered as one-hour infusion and repeated every three weeks can be given safely, featured no relevant myelotoxicity, and is the recommended dose for phase II studies.

rhG-CSF affects genes involved in mitogen signalling and early gene expression in the ovarian cancer cell line HEY.

The ovarian adenocarcinoma cell line HEY was used as an in vitro model to study the influence of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) on epithelial tumours such as ovarian cancer. Serum-starved cells were treated with rhG-CSF in a time- and dose-dependent manner. Cell proliferation, measured as cell division and DNA synthesis, was stimulated about 40% by rhG-CSF. After harvesting, cells were examined for the presence of G-CSF receptor (FACS analysis and RT-PCR), as well as for expression of genes involved in mitogen signalling (ERKs, JNKs) and early gene expression (c-jun). rhG-CSF affected mitogen-activated pathways and was receptor-mediated if the G-CSF receptor was present. After rhG-CSF induction, Janus N-terminal kinases (JNK 1 and 2) were simultaneously increased in the cytosol, up to 30-fold as measured by Western blotting), whereas ERK 1 and 2 accumulated maximally by 2.5-fold 1 hr after rhG-CSF induction. c-Jun was up-regulated strongly by this cytokine at the translational level. Our data suggest that rhG-CSF affects genes involved in mitogen signalling and early gene expression in solid tumours. We also noted the presence of G-CSF receptor on ovarian cancer cell lines.